Edition: International | Greek
MENU

Home » Europe

What do the regions really want?

A week full of debates and events about European regions and cities is over

By: EBR - Posted: Monday, October 16, 2017

Under this title, different battles are ongoing: grants versus financial instruments, Brexit versus budget cuts, simplification of rules versus shortening of implementation deadlines, innovation and digitalization versus convergence and infrastructures, lagging behind regions versus advanced regions.
Under this title, different battles are ongoing: grants versus financial instruments, Brexit versus budget cuts, simplification of rules versus shortening of implementation deadlines, innovation and digitalization versus convergence and infrastructures, lagging behind regions versus advanced regions.

by Nikos Lampropoulos*

Once again –for the 15th subsequent year- more than 6,000 participants around Europe gathered in Brussels to take part in what used to be a loose get-together and is now a well (maybe too well) structured multilevel event with thematic priorities and goals.

This special tribe of participants, composed mainly of elected members of local and regional authorities, administrators and consultants, talked of resilient cities, change agents, smart regions, sustainability, cohesion, and convergence.

Although many argue that the European Week of Regions and Cities becomes more of a show than a hands-on exchange of experiences, the truth is that these four days are still a unique opportunity for networking but also for the intense exchange of ideas among the stakeholders and the EU institutions, especially ahead of a new long-term budget period.

Next May, the Commission will present its proposal for the next financial period, the post-2020 Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF), which will not be easy to agree upon at a time when unprecedented challenges face the EU.

Now that the lights of the EWRC are off, the mayors and governors are back to their countries, but the real fight for the Cohesion Policy has just started and the debate is already hot: reform of cohesion policy in view of the next programming period.

Under this title, different battles are ongoing: grants versus financial instruments, Brexit versus budget cuts, simplification of rules versus shortening of implementation deadlines, innovation and digitalization versus convergence and infrastructures, lagging behind regions versus advanced regions.

What is actually at stake: the size of the pot, the distribution of the funds, the decision-making process, the priorities and the terms of implementation.

Commissioner Corina Cretu presented the 7th Cohesion Report at the opening of the EWRC, and revealed some proposals for the post-2020 Cohesion Policy. The Report was perceived positively but also raised questions about the implementation.

CPMR, a lobby association representing over 150 regions, raised concerns about the focus of the policy, the distribution of the funds and the link with the European Semester.

During the Joint Meeting of the REGI Committee of the European Parliament and the Commission for Territorial Cohesion Policy and EU Budget (COTER) in the Committee of the Regions (COR), despite their differences, the major political groups seem to converge on two conclusions: that cohesion policy is delivering results for the benefit of the citizens and that there is a need for faster procedures in deciding about the future.

Centre-right MEP Lambert Van Nistelrooij (EPP) underlined that time cannot be wasted and non-performing regions should either use or lose the allocated funds.

Centre-left Andrea Cozzolino, the chair of COTER, asked for reformed rules that will support less developed Regions to absorb the available funds. MEP Matthijs van Miltenburg supported the idea of strengthening cross-border investments also though the INTERREG programme.

Cattaneo pointed out that cohesion policy is under attack. And he noted that public investment is decreasing and becomes more centralised. Governor of Western Greece Apostolos Katsifaras focused on the need to regain the trust of the citizens.

Commissioner’s proposal is focusing on four pillars, which all stakeholders seem more or less to agree on: trust, performance, flexibility, simplification. But the interpretation of these pillars differs.

The post-2020 cohesion policy will for sure incorporate major changes compared to the current one.

The “camps” are gathering forces, ahead of the final battle ahead, to influence the focus of the policy but also the tools and the mechanisms – that sometimes are of equal importance of the goals – of implementation.

*Nikos Lampropoulos is editor of EURACTIV Greece
**First published in EurActiv.com

READ ALSO

EU Actually

Respite for Wikileaks founder Assange

N. Peter KramerBy: N. Peter Kramer

Wikileaks founder Julian Assange can stay in the United Kingdom for at least another two months

View 04/2021 2021 Digital edition

Magazine

Current Issue

04/2021 2021

View past issues
Subscribe
Advertise
Digital edition

Europe

From abortion rights to assisted dying: Macron’s 180-degree shift

From abortion rights to assisted dying: Macron’s 180-degree shift

In the latest episode of our Today in the EU podcast, we are looking at how European elections have impacted French President Emmanuel Macron’s policy choices

Business

Artificial intelligence and competitiveness in the retail sector

Artificial intelligence and competitiveness in the retail sector

The importance of AI and machine learning in the retail market is confirmed by the projected dramatic growth of AI services worldwide, which will skyrocket from $5 billion to $30 billion by 2030

MARKET INDICES

Powered by Investing.com
All contents © Copyright EMG Strategic Consulting Ltd. 1997-2024. All Rights Reserved   |   Home Page  |   Disclaimer  |   Website by Theratron