Edition: International | Greek
MENU

Home » Analyses

When your “One-China policy” is challenged

It is no news that China bullies Taiwan. But China’s recent coercion of foreign companies is news, and should be a wake-up call for countries to think about whether their own “One-China policy” has been infringed

By: EBR - Posted: Monday, July 16, 2018

Now, after decades of such practices, China is waging a worldwide campaign to impose its own definition of “One-China policy” by coercing countries, as well as foreign companies, to restrict even unofficial ties with Taiwan. China is unilaterally changing the status quo, and is a major cause of instability and potential conflict in Asia, if not beyond.
Now, after decades of such practices, China is waging a worldwide campaign to impose its own definition of “One-China policy” by coercing countries, as well as foreign companies, to restrict even unofficial ties with Taiwan. China is unilaterally changing the status quo, and is a major cause of instability and potential conflict in Asia, if not beyond.

by Harry Ho-Jen Tseng*

While most countries in the world have adopted a “One-China policy”, there is no consensus on what it means, except that it forbids official relations with Taiwan. Indeed, the scope for differing interpretations has allowed countries, including China itself, to maintain unofficial relations. 

Now, after decades of such practices, China is waging a worldwide campaign to impose its own definition of “One-China policy” by coercing countries, as well as foreign companies, to restrict even unofficial ties with Taiwan. China is unilaterally changing the status quo, and is a major cause of instability and potential conflict in Asia, if not beyond.

The government in Beijing recently set its sights on content referring to Taiwan on the websites of multinational companies. In January 2018, for example, China blocked access to the website of a US hospitality company, Marriott International, for referring to Taiwan as a country. The blockage was lifted only after Marriott’s chief executive issued a public apology. 

In April, the Civil Aviation Administration of China demanded 36 international airlines cease referring to Taiwan as a country on websites, apps, and other promotional materials, and instead refer to “Taiwan, China” or “Taiwan Region, China”. Those who failed to comply would face punitive measures.

The US State Department has publicly opposed China’s threat towards US companies and expressed strong concern to the China. A White House statement described China’s actions as “Orwellian nonsense,” going on to state that, “China’s efforts to export its censorship and political correctness to Americans and the rest of the world will be resisted.” 

An EU spokesperson voiced the criticism that, “Outside China, it is for private companies and individuals to manage their online content within the law…China’s attempts to regulate such online content aims at curtailing the freedoms that foreign businesses must continue to enjoy.”

China’s coercion and heavy-handed behavior should be seen as an attempt to directly impose its administrative jurisdiction on the companies and citizens of other countries. If they do not resist, these countries risk being willing to tolerate an attack on the integrity of their sovereignty, and on the legal rights and interests of their companies and citizens.

The Chinese government’s forcing of censorship and its own political ideology on private companies should be stopped and condemned. Such actions encroach on judicial sovereignty and violate provisions regarding commercial freedom as set out by the World Trade Organisation. We call on all concerned parties in your country to confront China’s provocations. We urge your government to take all actions necessary to uphold your version of “One-China policy,” by not giving in to the pressure from Beijing to curtail and minimize your unofficial relations with Taiwan.

*Harry Ho-Jen Tseng is Taiwan Representative to the EU and Belgium

READ ALSO

EU Actually

Is France setting the tone for modern agricultural laws?

N. Peter KramerBy: N. Peter Kramer

Following promises made to protesting farmers, the French government has presented a new draft of the agricultural policy law

View 04/2021 2021 Digital edition

Magazine

Current Issue

04/2021 2021

View past issues
Subscribe
Advertise
Digital edition

Europe

EU’s 2050 net zero goals at risk as EV rollout faces setbacks

EU’s 2050 net zero goals at risk as EV rollout faces setbacks

The EU needs to rethink its policies to make a 2035 ban on new petrol car sales feasible as electric vehicles (EVs) remain unaffordable and alternative fuel options are not credible, the EU’s external auditor said

Business

New dynamic economic model with a digital footprint

New dynamic economic model with a digital footprint

It is a fact that a new dynamic economic model is now beginning to emerge in entrepreneurship in the framework of the 4th industrial revolution and the digital challenges of our time

MARKET INDICES

Powered by Investing.com
All contents © Copyright EMG Strategic Consulting Ltd. 1997-2024. All Rights Reserved   |   Home Page  |   Disclaimer  |   Website by Theratron