Edition: International | Greek
MENU

Home » Europe

‘Frugal Four’ working on counter-proposal to Franco-German recovery fund

The €500 billion Franco-German EU recovery plan, presented on Monday (18 May), is too generous, according to the “Frugal Four” countries, who are working on a counter-proposal insisting on loans instead of grants and subsidies

By: EBR - Posted: Thursday, May 21, 2020

“We believe that it is possible to boost the European economy and still avoid a mutualisation of debts,” Kurz said.
“We believe that it is possible to boost the European economy and still avoid a mutualisation of debts,” Kurz said.

by Philipp Grull

Just hours after the proposal’s roll-out, Austrian Chancellor Sebastian Kurz (OVP) quickly informed the public via Twitter that he had objections to the plan for an EU reconstruction fund, unveiled by German Chancellor Angela Merkel and French President Emmanuel Macron.

The next day he announced that he would work on his own ideas for the reconstruction fund with the so-called ‘Frugal Four,’ a group which also includes Denmark, the Netherlands, and Sweden.

“We believe that it is possible to boost the European economy and still avoid a mutualisation of debts,” Kurz said in an interview with the newspaper Oberosterreichische Nachrichten. The plan should be available within this week, EURACTIV Germany learnt from diplomatic circles.

No “community debt in the guise of crisis”

The Frugal Four’s main problem with the Franco-German proposal is the decision to award grants instead of loans. Kurz already pointed this out in his tweet after the Merkel-Macron presentation, and this was further confirmed to EURACTIV Germany by diplomatic circles.

We are ready to help those countries that suffer most from the effects of the pandemic, Kurz wrote on behalf of the Frugal Four. However, money is only available in the form of loans, not grants, as Merkel and Macron had suggested.

In response to an enquiry from EURACTIV, Austrian Minister of Finance Gernot Blumel (OVP) also said before the ECOFIN meeting on Tuesday (19 May): “We still reject the financing of non-repayable subsidies,” because now is the time to “invest in the future, instead of covering the costs of past debts.”

For Austria, “community debts under the guise of the crisis” are unacceptable, said Blumel.

Austria’s opposition was quick to criticise its government.

In a tweet, Andreas Schieder, head of the Austrian Social Democrats’ delegation to the EU Parliament, described the Franco-German initiative as a “trendsetting proposal for European reconstruction.” He further called Kurz’ reaction a “blockade” which was “incomprehensible.”

*first published in: www.euractiv.com

READ ALSO

EU Actually

European Parliament challenges member-states with an additional budget increase of 10 percent

N. Peter KramerBy: N. Peter Kramer

In his weekly column, N. Peter Kramer writes how the EP opposes Commission’s proposal to cut back on traditional programmes such as agriculture and cohesion

Europe

The EU–India Deal Is Done. Africa Must Be Next

The EU–India Deal Is Done. Africa Must Be Next

The EU-India FTA deal showed Brussels can move when the stakes are high; Africa is the real test of whether Europe can protect its economic security in a more fractured world.

Business

Where Romania can build excellence: the sources of future competitiveness

Where Romania can build excellence: the sources of future competitiveness

Romania has been, for most of its recent history, a story of potential deferred. The standard account of Romanian competitiveness, to the extent one exists in international business literature, is a cost story: cheap labor, low corporate taxes, a large domestic market for Central and Eastern European standards.

MARKET INDICES

Powered by Investing.com
All contents © Copyright EMG Strategic Consulting Ltd. 1997-2026. All Rights Reserved   |   Home Page  |   Disclaimer  |   Website by Theratron