Edition: International | Greek
MENU

Home » Europe

”Failings, not success” of Romania’s anti-corruption efforts

A respected human rights group has questioned the European Union for using conviction statistics in Romania as “trophies in the fight against corruption.”

By: EBR - Posted: Thursday, March 29, 2018

The European Commission, via its “Cooperation and Verification Mechanism”, has praised the high numbers of arrests, despite what HRWF says are “well-documented concerns about irregularities” involved in the clampdown. The CVM serves to assist Romania to make progress with the rule of law through judicial reform and combating corruption and the Commission’s recently-published progress report of 2017 singles out “overall praise” for the DNA. Commission Jean-Claude Juncker also recently said that Romania had made “remarkable progress” in the rule of law.
The European Commission, via its “Cooperation and Verification Mechanism”, has praised the high numbers of arrests, despite what HRWF says are “well-documented concerns about irregularities” involved in the clampdown. The CVM serves to assist Romania to make progress with the rule of law through judicial reform and combating corruption and the Commission’s recently-published progress report of 2017 singles out “overall praise” for the DNA. Commission Jean-Claude Juncker also recently said that Romania had made “remarkable progress” in the rule of law.

by Martin Banks

Human Rights Without Frontiers International (HRWF) says the EU’s “rhetoric” does not reflect the reality of the situation in Romania. The European commission has praised the high number of arrests by Romania’s main anti-corruption agency, the National Anti-Corruption Directorate (DNA). The agency has seen record numbers of arrests, charges and convictions. But HRWF says it has “uncovered a “series of concerns regarding the tactics used to achieve such numbers.”

The Brussels-based HRWF, an independent campaign group, says the recent emergence of tapes allegedly showing two DNA prosecutors faking evidence and blackmailing witnesses illustrates the “failings, not success” of Romania’s anti-corruption efforts.  Earlier this year, two tapes were released in the media showing DNA prosecutors faking evidence and documents, planting evidence in people’s cars and homes, changing witness declarations, faking official records, and blackmailing witnesses.

The concerns flagged by HRWF are shared by several other respected organisations National Union of the Romanian Judges and the Paris-based Magistrates Association MEDEL which raised “serious doubts” about the respect for “basic human rights” in Romania. Another body, the Henry Jackson Society, claims that the DNA, set up in 2002 to investigate  and prosecute corruption, uses “various tactics of intimidation …. in keeping  conviction rates as high as possible.”

At the same time, hundreds of judges in Romania have petitioned the authorities to “defend the autonomy” of the judiciary. There are 6,979 judges in Romania, 1,000 of them trained by the SRI –the country’s intelligence service. It is claimed by HRWF that having so many judges and prosecutors trained by the SRI “has an enormous impact on the judiciary.”

Lea Perekrests, is deputy director of HRWF which has detailed these and other concerns in a new report. She told this website, “HRWF is critical of the Commission for its praise, because they fail to look beyond the numbers – to see exactly how the DNA is achieving such high records.” HRWF says the EU’s praise of the apparent Romanian “crackdown” on corruption is groundless, saying the DNA “has displayed signs of severe corruption and meddling in the judicial system.” The 18-page report by HRWF on human rights in Romania says, “It is apparent that the success’ rates of the DNA are not indicative of a successful anti-corruption campaign.” Perekrests said, “HRWF is critical of the Commission for its praise, because they fail to look beyond the numbers – to see exactly how the DNA is achieving such high records.”

The European Commission, via its “Cooperation and Verification Mechanism”, has praised the high numbers of arrests, despite what HRWF says are “well-documented concerns about irregularities” involved in the clampdown. The CVM serves to assist Romania to make progress with the rule of law through judicial reform and combating corruption and the Commission’s recently-published progress report of 2017 singles out “overall praise” for the DNA. Commission Jean-Claude Juncker also recently said that Romania had made “remarkable progress” in the rule of law.

Since the appointment of Laura Codruƫa Kӧvesi as its chief prosecutor, the DNA has achieved more asset freezes, arrests and convictions than any other counterpart agency in the EU. Since 2006, the DNA has sent over 70 Romanian MPs to trial, one of the most high profile cases being that of the former prime minister, Victor Ponta, who was accused of forgery, money-laundering and tax evasion in September 2015. In February, Tudorel Toader, Romania’s justice minister, presented a 36-page critical report on the activities of Kӧvesi.

Even the 2017 progress report by the EU’s CVM conceded that “Romania still needs many reforms in order to achieve all of the Commission’s recommendations.” Concern has also been voiced several MEPs, including UK Socialist Claude Moraes,at  the alleged mis- use by the Romanian authorities of the European Arrest Warrant, an important tool in combating serious cross-border crime. It has been claimed that a number of Romanians as well as other EU citizens have been indicted on “spurious charges.” Last March, Vera Jourova, the EU commissioner for justice, said the commission was “aware that sometimes EAWs are being used in a non-proportional manner.”

HRWF says that “bringing to light the seriousness” of the situation “reveals the scale of the corruption.From our investigations, it has become clear that there are a number of serious systemic problems in Romani regarding the judicial system.” Looking to the future, it says that compliance with international standards “is not likely” in the near future.

READ ALSO

EU Actually

Only President Antonio Costa believes in a deal in his EU Council before Christmas

N. Peter KramerBy: N. Peter Kramer

In his weekly column N. Peter Kramer writes that EU member states are deeply divided over the EU’s next seven-year budget. Do we know more after the EU Council on Thursday?

Europe

The EU’s Middle-Power Puzzle

The EU’s Middle-Power Puzzle

While the EU and European governments are embracing the much-lauded middle-power moment, this entails three difficult conundrums

Business

Businesscraft: Japan’s Quiet Discipline for a Fractured World

Businesscraft: Japan’s Quiet Discipline for a Fractured World

For almost thirty years after the end of the Cold War, geopolitics stayed away from the corporate boardroom. Geopolitical considerations belonged to the foreign ministry or to a dedicated risk committee back at headquarters, and rarely crossed a CEO’s desk.

MARKET INDICES

Powered by Investing.com
All contents © Copyright EMG Strategic Consulting Ltd. 1997-2026. All Rights Reserved   |   Home Page  |   Disclaimer  |   Website by Theratron