Edition: International | Greek
MENU

Home » Editor’s Column

The battle about the EU multiannual budget has begun

The EU budget will be left with a gap of €12 billion a year after the UK leaves

By: N. Peter Kramer - Posted: Thursday, September 20, 2018

In a meeting of the European Economic and Social Committee (EESC), he pointed the finger at Sweden, Denmark, The Netherlands, Austria, Germany and Finland; the ‘rich’ member states refusing to increase their contributions.
In a meeting of the European Economic and Social Committee (EESC), he pointed the finger at Sweden, Denmark, The Netherlands, Austria, Germany and Finland; the ‘rich’ member states refusing to increase their contributions.

by  N. Peter Kramer

Normal human beings think, logically, that when a member of the family leaves home, he will not pay board anymore, and also that one person less means lower housekeeping costs. 

The European Commission and the European Parliament have a different way of thinking: they just want more, much more, budget after Brexit. 

No Brussels insider is surprised; these two institutions always want more: more money, more buildings, more staff.  

The problem, however, is, that some of the member states, the so-called net-payers, have to pay the bill. It is not surprising they are not very willing to do so

It makes the Commissioner responsible for Budget, the German Gunther Oettinger (the commissioner who missed getting the Vice-President title, due to his disparaging remarks about women, Jews and southern-Europeans) very angry. 

In a meeting of the European Economic and Social Committee (EESC), he pointed the finger at Sweden, Denmark, The Netherlands, Austria, Germany and Finland; the ‘rich’ member states refusing to increase their contributions. 

Some of them argued that ‘a smaller EU should mean a smaller budget’, not even a maintenance of the current budget!

Members of the EESC asked for the ‘own resources’ of the Commission to be increased. Oettinger had another go at the member states. ‘Commission proposals are blocked by member states’, he said. 

His examples: a 3% levy on digital revenues of large firms (Google, Facebook) and the Financial Transactions Tax. But member states don’t like to leave taxation to the Commission and the Parliament, bearing in mind the saying ‘You don’t let the dog fill his own food bowl’.

The battle on the EU’s Multiannual Financial Framework 2021-2027 has started. Oettinger would like to finish the negotiations before the European Parliament Elections in May 2019, to send a signal to EU citizens with his higher budget. 

Wouldn’t a lower EU budget surely send a better signal? 

READ ALSO

Editor’s Column

The EP cacophony after Lagarde’s hearing

N. Peter KramerBy: N. Peter Kramer

On Wednesday Christine Lagarde had her ‘hearing’ in the EP’s Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs

View 02/2019 2019 Digital edition

Magazine

Current Issue

02/2019 2019

View past issues
Subscribe
Advertise
Digital edition

Europe

Concerns and expectations for the new Commission

Concerns and expectations for the new Commission

The incoming President of the European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen, presented the new structure of the Commission, the body of the Union’s executive power and the responsibilities of the Commissioners

Business

Here’s how a trade war between the US and China could reshape the global order

Here’s how a trade war between the US and China could reshape the global order

US-China trade tensions have negatively affected consumers as well as many producers in both countries. The tariffs have reduced trade between the US and China, but the bilateral trade deficit remains broadly unchanged

MARKET INDICES

Powered by Investing.com
All contents © Copyright EMG Strategic Consulting Ltd. 1997-2019. All Rights Reserved   |   Home Page  |   Disclaimer  |   Website by Theratron