Edition: International | Greek
MENU

Home » Analyses

Blow for Vestager: tax deal The Netherlands with Starbucks not illegal!

The tax arrangements that the Dutch Tax Authorities have made with the American coffee chain Starbucks are not in conflict with European rules

By: N. Peter Kramer - Posted: Wednesday, September 25, 2019

"The Commission has not succeeded in proving that there was an advantage in favor of Starbucks," is the verdict of the judges in Luxembourg.
"The Commission has not succeeded in proving that there was an advantage in favor of Starbucks," is the verdict of the judges in Luxembourg.

by N.Peter Kramer

The tax arrangements that the Dutch Tax Authorities have made with the American coffee chain Starbucks are not in conflict with European rules. The European Court of First Instance blew the whistle on the European Commission on its decision, that the Netherlands had to reclaim 25.7 million euros from Starbucks for alleged state aid.

In 2015, the European Commission ruled that between 2008 and 2014 the Netherlands had granted unlawful state aid through tax agreements. Due to a construction with intellectual property rights abroad, the fees for roasting coffee beans in the Netherlands were not taxed. According to EU Competition Commissioner Margrethe Vestager, this shift with profits resulted in an artificial and illegal reduction of the tax. The Dutch government and Starbucks challenged this decision because it had not been conclusively demonstrated that the tax authorities had violated rules and that there was no question of unlawful state aid.

The General Court of the European Union now agrees with that and annul the decision of the European Commission. "The Commission has not succeeded in proving that there was an advantage in favor of Starbucks," is the verdict of the judges in Luxembourg. According to the Court of First Instance, the Commission made errors in the assessment of the tax arrangements.

Meanwhile, The Netherlands has recovered 25.7 million euros from Starbucks. That amount can be refunded if the European Commission does not appeal. The Commission has two month to do this.

READ ALSO

EU Actually

‘Brussels’ preference for technocrats instead of democracy

N. Peter KramerBy: N. Peter Kramer

Matteo Renzi, once the favourite of Brussels eurocrats, withdrew his support from Prime Minister Giuseppe Conte’s coalition, leaving the Italian government several seats short of a majority in the Senate

View 04/2020 2020 Digital edition

Magazine

Current Issue

04/2020 2020

View past issues
Subscribe
Advertise
Digital edition

Europe

‘Right to disconnect’ should be an EU-wide fundamental right, MEPs say

‘Right to disconnect’ should be an EU-wide fundamental right, MEPs say

Parliament calls for an EU law that grants workers the right to digitally disconnect from work without facing negative repercussions

Business

How Boards Can Steer Companies to “Build Back Better”

How Boards Can Steer Companies to “Build Back Better”

As the novel coronavirus swept the globe last year, the European Union, China, Japan and the United Kingdom announced ambitious plans to cut emissions over the next decades

MARKET INDICES

Powered by Investing.com
All contents © Copyright EMG Strategic Consulting Ltd. 1997-2021. All Rights Reserved   |   Home Page  |   Disclaimer  |   Website by Theratron