Edition: International | Greek
MENU

Home » Analyses

Blow for Vestager: tax deal The Netherlands with Starbucks not illegal!

The tax arrangements that the Dutch Tax Authorities have made with the American coffee chain Starbucks are not in conflict with European rules

By: N. Peter Kramer - Posted: Wednesday, September 25, 2019

"The Commission has not succeeded in proving that there was an advantage in favor of Starbucks," is the verdict of the judges in Luxembourg.
"The Commission has not succeeded in proving that there was an advantage in favor of Starbucks," is the verdict of the judges in Luxembourg.

by N.Peter Kramer

The tax arrangements that the Dutch Tax Authorities have made with the American coffee chain Starbucks are not in conflict with European rules. The European Court of First Instance blew the whistle on the European Commission on its decision, that the Netherlands had to reclaim 25.7 million euros from Starbucks for alleged state aid.

In 2015, the European Commission ruled that between 2008 and 2014 the Netherlands had granted unlawful state aid through tax agreements. Due to a construction with intellectual property rights abroad, the fees for roasting coffee beans in the Netherlands were not taxed. According to EU Competition Commissioner Margrethe Vestager, this shift with profits resulted in an artificial and illegal reduction of the tax. The Dutch government and Starbucks challenged this decision because it had not been conclusively demonstrated that the tax authorities had violated rules and that there was no question of unlawful state aid.

The General Court of the European Union now agrees with that and annul the decision of the European Commission. "The Commission has not succeeded in proving that there was an advantage in favor of Starbucks," is the verdict of the judges in Luxembourg. According to the Court of First Instance, the Commission made errors in the assessment of the tax arrangements.

Meanwhile, The Netherlands has recovered 25.7 million euros from Starbucks. That amount can be refunded if the European Commission does not appeal. The Commission has two month to do this.

READ ALSO

EU Actually

After a painful NATO exercise: are all those billions for defense being spent wisely?

N. Peter KramerBy: N. Peter Kramer

NATO reported on its website about a large-scale exercise organised by a multinational battlegroup in Estonia. The soldiers had to train in temperatures of 20 degrees below zero. The military alliance is investing significant resources in defending its eastern flank.

Europe

Macron Makes France a Great Middle Power

Macron Makes France a Great Middle Power

France has stopped clinging to notions of being a great power and is embracing the middle power moment. But Emmanuel Macron has his work cut out if he is to secure his country’s global standing before his term in office ends.

Business

The EU’s zig-zag road towards stronger financial markets

The EU’s zig-zag road towards stronger financial markets

Giles Merritt delves into the confusing welter of efforts to streamline Europe’s national financial players into a more dynamic single capital market

MARKET INDICES

Powered by Investing.com
All contents © Copyright EMG Strategic Consulting Ltd. 1997-2026. All Rights Reserved   |   Home Page  |   Disclaimer  |   Website by Theratron