Edition: International | Greek
MENU

Home » World

Trump’s Supreme Court candidate dodges a tricky issue

Is it legally correct that shortly before the presidential elections in 2016 the Republican majority in the US Senate blocked the nomination for an Associate Justice by Democratic President Obama?

By: N. Peter Kramer - Posted: Wednesday, October 14, 2020

Last month President Donald Trump nominated conservative judge Amy Coney Barrett to succeed the late Ruth Bader Ginsburg, a progressive icon.
Last month President Donald Trump nominated conservative judge Amy Coney Barrett to succeed the late Ruth Bader Ginsburg, a progressive icon.

by N. Peter Kramer

Is it legally correct that shortly before the presidential elections in 2016 the Republican majority in the US Senate blocked the nomination for an Associate Justice by Democratic President Obama? And 4 years later the Republican majority in the Senate impose the nomination for an Associate Justice by Republican President Trump? The answer is Yes; a majority in the Senate has the right to do so, in both cases. Democrats know that, and, let us be honest, would do the same. That is the reason, Democratic senators are now looking for a way out because they cannot stop the process.

Last month President Donald Trump nominated conservative judge Amy Coney Barrett to succeed the late Ruth Bader Ginsburg, a progressive icon. Barrett’s appointment would significantly tilt the ideological balance of the US Supreme Court towards the conservative side, with six conservative justices versus here progressives. Nominating conservative justices to the Supreme Court was, by the way, a major election promise from Trump. After a few days of hearings in the US Senate Justice Committee over the nomination of Barrett, Trump is urging the Senate to move quickly towards her nomination.

The President suspects that a ninth Associate Justice will be necessary in the event of a questionable or unclear presidential election result. ‘I think this (election result) will go to the Supreme Court’, said the President at the White House two days before nominating Barrett, ‘and I think in that case it is important to have nine justices in that court. Four against four is not a good situation’.

During the hearings, Democratic senators, not able to stop the nomination of Amy Coney Barrett, asked her to promise in advance that she will step aside if the result of the November 3 presidential election reaches the Supreme Court. She declined to promise so. However, simply assuming that a lifelong justice will remain loyal to the President who nominated him or her is dangerous. Neil Gorsuch, the first justice to be nominated by Trump, defended equal rights in the workplace for LGBT people.

READ ALSO

EU Actually

Extreme weather or not, the climate summit in Belem is in danger

N. Peter KramerBy: N. Peter Kramer

That the weather is becoming more and more extreme does not lead to more political urgency

View 04/2021 2021 Digital edition

Magazine

Current Issue

04/2021 2021

View past issues
Subscribe
Advertise
Digital edition

Europe

How the EU can think creatively for sanctions on Russia

How the EU can think creatively for sanctions on Russia

Ahead of Thursday’s European Council summit, it is hard to deny that EU sanctions on Russia are facing headwinds

Business

To save the Single Market, bring back Delors’ 1992 playbook

To save the Single Market, bring back Delors’ 1992 playbook

Most people familiar with EU affairs know the single market is a myth. Hailed as the bedrock of the European Union, it was never completed and is now crumbling.

MARKET INDICES

Powered by Investing.com
All contents © Copyright EMG Strategic Consulting Ltd. 1997-2025. All Rights Reserved   |   Home Page  |   Disclaimer  |   Website by Theratron