Edition: International | Greek
MENU

Home » EU Actually

EU prophets of doom were wrong

Following the 2016 referendum in the UK there were predictions by EU prophets of doom, like chief-negotiator Barnier, that banks, hedge funds and other financial firms would leave London’s City en-mass

By: N. Peter Kramer - Posted: Wednesday, February 24, 2021

"At the moment all signs are that the UK has few, if any, plans to undercut the EU regulatory framework. In most cases, with the possible exception of insurance and hedge funds, new UK laws are unlikely to mean looser regulation."
"At the moment all signs are that the UK has few, if any, plans to undercut the EU regulatory framework. In most cases, with the possible exception of insurance and hedge funds, new UK laws are unlikely to mean looser regulation."

N. Peter Kramer’s Weekly Column

Following the 2016 referendum in the UK there were predictions by EU prophets of doom, like chief-negotiator Barnier, that banks, hedge funds and other financial firms would leave London’s City en-mass. However, it becomes clear that this exodus has not happened at all, rather the contrary. Financial consultants have made it known that 1500 money managers, payment firms, insurers and the likes have applied for permission to continue operating in London after Brexit; two-thirds do not even have their current base in the UK. Around 400 of them are insurance companies which suggests that UK PLC is in good health, at least when it comes to high finance. There has been a slow drip of financial service firms leaving the City for Frankfurt and Amsterdam because the European Commission dictated that euro-denominated shares must be traded inside the EU.

There is still unfinished business between the two sides: for instance, in financial and digital services. However, the European Commission recently published its draft ‘adequacy decision’ that will ensure that free flow of data between the EU and the UK can continue. In financial services officials already agreed on a joint Memorandum of Understanding by the end of March. It seems that this MoU is likely to cover mutual recognition of professional qualifications and equivalence agreements whereby the two sides recognise each other’s regulation.

At the moment all signs are that the UK has few, if any, plans to undercut the EU regulatory framework. In most cases, with the possible exception of insurance and hedge funds, new UK laws are unlikely to mean looser regulation. On the contrary, the UK has tended to want more stringent rules on bank capital requirements than the EU.

So there seems to be little suggestion that the UK poses any threat to the so called ‘integrity of the single market’.

READ ALSO

EU Actually

After a painful NATO exercise: are all those billions for defense being spent wisely?

N. Peter KramerBy: N. Peter Kramer

NATO reported on its website about a large-scale exercise organised by a multinational battlegroup in Estonia. The soldiers had to train in temperatures of 20 degrees below zero. The military alliance is investing significant resources in defending its eastern flank.

Europe

Europe on Iran: Gone with the Wind

Europe on Iran: Gone with the Wind

Europe’s reaction to the war in Iran has been disunited and meek, a far cry from its previously leading role in diplomacy with Tehran. To avoid being condemned to the sidelines while escalation continues, Brussels needs to stand up for international law.

Business

The EU’s zig-zag road towards stronger financial markets

The EU’s zig-zag road towards stronger financial markets

Giles Merritt delves into the confusing welter of efforts to streamline Europe’s national financial players into a more dynamic single capital market

MARKET INDICES

Powered by Investing.com
All contents © Copyright EMG Strategic Consulting Ltd. 1997-2026. All Rights Reserved   |   Home Page  |   Disclaimer  |   Website by Theratron