Edition: International | Greek
MENU

Home » EU Actually

Commission lowers European climate change goals

For years the EU wanted to be a global green leader and tried to set the global standard for climate-change regulation, creating touch rules on emissions, mandating more use of renewable energy sources and even sacrificed some economic grow.

By: EBR - Posted: Monday, January 27, 2014

‘The previously farsighted and ambitious European Commission is a shadow of its former self’, said Thomas Becker, chief executive of the European Wind Energy Association. Markus Beyrer, director-general of Business Europe called in the Financial Times the pack of measures published by the European Commission ‘positive’.
‘The previously farsighted and ambitious European Commission is a shadow of its former self’, said Thomas Becker, chief executive of the European Wind Energy Association. Markus Beyrer, director-general of Business Europe called in the Financial Times the pack of measures published by the European Commission ‘positive’.

by N. Peter Kramer

Backed by the European Parliament the Commission was on track of saving planet Earth! But the EU discovered that hardly any other country in the world was willing to engage; real big polluters, China and the US, ignored the European appeals. The global Copenhagen Climate Change Summit 2011 was dominated by the American and the Chinese President; the EU had to stay in the wings. And let’s not forget that inside the EU, Poland and the UK, two of the biggest European economies, never full hearted followed the efforts demanded by the EP and the Commission.       

Last week the Commission has taken a step back from the ambitious environmental agenda with a new set of energy targets for the year 2030 that emphasise the need for economic growth and industrial competitiveness. A victory for industry groups is, that the 2030 targets do not include any more mandatory goals for the memberstates to increase the amount of energy generate from renewable sources such as wind and solar energy. Instead it substituted an overall EU goal, much harder to enforce. Remarkable is also that the Commission decided not to propose laws on environmental damage during the extraction of shale gas. It is up to the memberstates to decide. At the moment the UK is pushing it through but France doesn’t want it; what means there will be no European policy on shale gas winning…

‘The previously farsighted and ambitious European Commission is a shadow of its former self’, said Thomas Becker, chief executive of the European Wind Energy Association. Markus Beyrer, director-general of Business Europe called in the Financial Times the pack of measures published by the European Commission ‘positive’. 

The debate in the European Parliament looks to become very interesting. But one way or the other, it is clear our environment will be the loser!

READ ALSO

EU Actually

Only President Antonio Costa believes in a deal in his EU Council before Christmas

N. Peter KramerBy: N. Peter Kramer

In his weekly column N. Peter Kramer writes that EU member states are deeply divided over the EU’s next seven-year budget. Do we know more after the EU Council on Thursday?

Europe

The EU’s Middle-Power Puzzle

The EU’s Middle-Power Puzzle

While the EU and European governments are embracing the much-lauded middle-power moment, this entails three difficult conundrums

Business

Businesscraft: Japan’s Quiet Discipline for a Fractured World

Businesscraft: Japan’s Quiet Discipline for a Fractured World

For almost thirty years after the end of the Cold War, geopolitics stayed away from the corporate boardroom. Geopolitical considerations belonged to the foreign ministry or to a dedicated risk committee back at headquarters, and rarely crossed a CEO’s desk.

MARKET INDICES

Powered by Investing.com
All contents © Copyright EMG Strategic Consulting Ltd. 1997-2026. All Rights Reserved   |   Home Page  |   Disclaimer  |   Website by Theratron