Edition: International | Greek

Home » Editor’s Column

High Representative / VP Federica Mogherini also Commander-in-Chief of the EU Army

Listening to the martial language used by the highest ranked EU dignitaries such as Juncker, Tusk, Tajani and Mogherini, their EU has many enemies: Donald Trump, Vladimir Putin, Recep Erdogan and, after Brexit, maybe even the UK

By: N. Peter Kramer - Posted: Wednesday, July 12, 2017

text size [–] [+]
What about the money? And what about the relationship with NATO?  Proud Commission President Juncker presented the EU Defence Plan and mentioned the price tag - €5,5 billion!  Naturally born by the member states. The money will be redistributed to them by the Commission, of course after deducting the costs of Brussels bureaucracy and probably a new palace, a HQ for the EU Army.
What about the money? And what about the relationship with NATO? Proud Commission President Juncker presented the EU Defence Plan and mentioned the price tag - €5,5 billion! Naturally born by the member states. The money will be redistributed to them by the Commission, of course after deducting the costs of Brussels bureaucracy and probably a new palace, a HQ for the EU Army.

MORE ON Editor’s Column

by N. Peter Kramer

Consequently, for those in Brussels ivory towers, an EU Army seems more appropriate than ever! Donald Tusk, the EU Council President, called it an historic moment when the Council decided unanimously in June to accept the Commission’s EU Defence Plan.   The plan is intended to strengthen EU military cooperation, soon to transform into EU Battlegroups!  Although nobody knows quite yet what that means.  

High Representative/Commission VP Federica Mogherini, speaking in the Euro Parliament about the European Defence Plan, was already assuming the stature of a future EU Defence Minister.   ‘Binding commitments between Member States to jointly develop and deploy military capabilities should pave the way for … a Permanent Structured Cooperation’. Mogherini mentioned the establishment of a command centre in Brussels for operational planning and conduct of military training.  

Whilst some of Mogherini’s colleagues deny the ambition for an EU army, she was talking in the EP as if it already exists,  referring to the activities of ‘men and women in EU uniform serving under the EU flag’. Mogherini made clear to the EP, that she has more than two hats: VP of the Commission and  High Commissioner member of the Council, as everybody knows,  but also a third one, as head of the European Defence Agency! In other words, she is The Commander-in-Chief of the EU Army! 

What about the money? And what about the relationship with NATO?  Proud Commission President Juncker presented the EU Defence Plan and mentioned the price tag - €5,5 billion!  Naturally born by the member states. The money will be redistributed to them by the Commission, of course after deducting the costs of Brussels bureaucracy and probably a new palace, a HQ for the EU Army.  

The UK Conservative Defence Spokesman in the EP, Geoffrey Van Orden MEP, commented: ‘Instead of supporting the Commission the Member States should put their efforts into rejuvenating their armed forces and revitalising NATO’. He called for interoperability between all NATO nations, the US and its European allies. What he probably meant to say was  let NATO members first keep their financial commitments to NATO, and pay their 2% of GDP contribution *  instead of following the megalomaniac dreams of the Commission and its President who dared to claim that the EU Defence Plan is what the EU citizens are waiting for…   

*22 EU Member States are NATO allies, only four of them pay the agreed 2%: Estonia, Greece, Poland and the UK 

Europe

The balance of powers in the new European Parliament

With majorities in the European Parliament becoming more unstable, votes are becoming more unpredictable. The power structure has shifted considerably as a result of the European elections. While the liberal group Renew Europe will likely be decisive, German MEPs are set to be the most influential

Business

Here’s how a trade war between the US and China could reshape the global order

US-China trade tensions have negatively affected consumers as well as many producers in both countries. The tariffs have reduced trade between the US and China, but the bilateral trade deficit remains broadly unchanged

Editor’s Column

Boris Johnson and his mandate to take the UK out of the EU

By: N. Peter Kramer

The ball has come out of the scrum and Boris Johnson has been able to claim it. Many people are asking now, what is he going to do with it

MARKET INDICES

Powered by Investing.com

Magazine

View 02/2019 2019 Digital edition

Current Issue

02/2019 2019

View past issues
Subscribe
Advertise
Digital edition

All contents © Copyright EMG Strategic Consulting Ltd. 1997-2019. All Rights Reserved   |   Home Page  |   Disclaimer  |   Website by Theratron :)